Publications Index | Encyclopedia of Trotskyism | Marxists’s Internet Archive
Socialist Review Index (1993–1996) | Socialist Review 182 Contents
Briefing
Judges
A job for life
From Socialist Review, No. 182, January 1995.
Copyright © Socialist Review.
Copied with thanks from the Socialist Review Archive.
Marked up by Einde O’Callaghan for ETOL.
- Over one in three people say that they have less faith in
British justice than they did five years ago, reported a NOP survey
in 1992.
- The biggest fall was among the middle income and middle
aged group. Nearly 23 percent of professionals and managers had
‘little or no’ faith in British justice, but this rose to 38
percent of skilled manual workers and unemployed.
- Judges are appointed by politicians, either the prime
minister or the Lord Chancellor (a government member), and usually
after discussions with other judges. For example, in 1990, all bar
one Law Lord (a judge sitting in the House of Lords), and all the
Appeal Lords, had been appointed by Thatcher.
- In 1991 when the Lord Chancellor suggested judges should
not be recruited exclusively from the Bar, Lord Lane told the House
of Lords that ending this monopoly would be, ‘the worst threat to
British freedom since Hitler’.
- Judges are paid massive salaries. In 1990, the Law Lords
received £82,750, the Appeal Court judges £79,500 and High Court
judges £72,000. This is for working an average of 25 hours per
week, and doesn’t include perks like free transport and ‘out of
town’ lodgings. Judges obviously experience the ‘feel good
factor’, having been given a pay rise this year of 12.5 percent.
- Retirement comes at the age of 75, although they can return
to specific cases if they choose. Judges cannot lose their pensions,
they cannot be sued for anything said or done in their capacity as a
judge, and the last time a British judge was sacked was in 1701.
- Judges share a remarkably similar background. In 1991, the
Law Lords had all been educated at public schools, nine of the ten
had gone on to Oxford or Cambridge, six out of ten had come from
titled families. Out of 31 Court of Appeal judges, 25 had been to
Oxbridge colleges.
- Of the 84 High Court judges in 1993, 80 percent are
Oxbridge graduates. Only three are women. Of all judges (including
Circuit and District), less than 1 percent are black.
- Barristers can now ask the Lord Chancellor if they can
become a judge but the Lord Chancellor can refuse the application
without an interview and without giving a reason.
- Elizabeth Butler-Sloss was the first woman High Court
judge, appointed in 1979, who assured the public she was still ‘very
much a housewife’ (Sunday Telegraph). She was also the sister of Tory
Attorney General Sir Michael Havers, the daughter of a High Court
judge and a Tory candidate in Lambeth in the 1959 election.
- Most judges insist they lead ordinary lives. Over a quarter
of all senior judges belong to the Garrick Club. Mr Justice Harman
had never heard of Bruce Springsteen or Gazza, refused to recognise
the term ‘Ms’ in court and divided women into three categories,
‘wives, mistresses and whores’.
- Not only do very few women become judges, they fare badly
in front of them. The sharp end of this has been in rape cases, and
more recently those involving date rape. Outrage greeted judge
Bertrand Richards who said that a woman, ‘was guilty of
contributing negligence’ because she had been raped when
hitchhiking home late at night.
- This kind of comment is not exceptional from the judiciary.
Summing up in a rape trial, Judge Wild stated, ‘If she doesn’t
want it, she only has to keep her legs shut’, and Judge Sutcliffe
directed a jury to be sceptical about a rape victim’s evidence,
saying, ‘It is known that women and small boys are liable to be
untruthful and invent stories.’
- Research by groups such as the Society of Black Lawyers has
shown that not only is it very difficult for black and Asian people
to become judges, but that they also suffer greater injustice in
court. Blacks are less likely to be granted bail than their white
counterparts, and are more likely to receive higher sentences for
similar offences.
- Even in cases like those of Winston Silcott or the Cardiff
Three, where there was no evidence to support prosecution, the
judges accepted the word of the police and directed the jury to find
the defendants guilty.
- Trials by jury result in a higher rate of acquittal than
trials where judges and magistrates alone decide guilt. But only
around 2 percent of cases make it to a jury trial, and even then
judges frequently direct the jury to find a particular result.
- The Nazi John Kingsley Read was taken to court for
incitement to racial hatred after saying, ‘One down, a million to
go,’ after an Asian student had been murdered. The judge, Neil
MacKinnon, seemed to agree with him, saying, ‘We are allowed to
have our own views still, thank goodness, and long may it last ... I
wish you well.’ Over 100 MPs called for his dismissal. He stayed
in his post, but was not given any more cases dealing with racism.
- If a jury finds someone guilty, the judge still decides the
sentence. And if the law stands in the way, as Lord Denning said of
himself and his judicial colleagues, ‘We have ways and means of
getting round the law.’
Top of page
Socialist Review Index | ETOL Main Page
Last updated: 28 November 2017